The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 53 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHIO HASEGAWA and MASASHI SAHASHI ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2046 Application No. 08/059,350 ____________ HEARD: July 12, 2000 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 40-63 and 65-85. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to an inductor used as a choke coil on the output side of a direct current (DC)-to-DC converter. Although the use of a planarPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007