Ex parte WEBSTER et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-2057                                                        
          Application No. 08/287,670                                                  
          managed, and allowing the retention of information stored in                
          the integrated circuit when the integrated circuit is operated              
          in a reduced power mode, and allowing submicrosecond recovery               
          of internal functional circuit function upon the assertion of               
          the second externally generated electrical signal.                          
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Chase et al. (Chase)          4,593,349                Jun. 03,             
          1986                                                                        
          Itano et al. (Itano)          4,906,862                Mar. 06,             
          1990                                                                        
          Takada                        4,950,921                Aug. 21,             
          1990                                                                        
          Bolan et al. (Bolan)          4,952,817                Aug. 28,             
          1990                                                                        
          Faucher et al. (Faucher)           5,404,543                Apr.            
          04, 1995                                                                    
                                                  (filed May 29, 1992)                
               Claims 7 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Takada in view of Bolan and                      
          Faucher, and further in view of Itano for claim 8 or Chase for              
          claim 9.                                                                    
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 17,              
          mailed January 7, 1997) for the examiner's complete reasoning               
          in                                                                          







                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007