Appeal No. 1997-2057 Application No. 08/287,670 managed, and allowing the retention of information stored in the integrated circuit when the integrated circuit is operated in a reduced power mode, and allowing submicrosecond recovery of internal functional circuit function upon the assertion of the second externally generated electrical signal. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Chase et al. (Chase) 4,593,349 Jun. 03, 1986 Itano et al. (Itano) 4,906,862 Mar. 06, 1990 Takada 4,950,921 Aug. 21, 1990 Bolan et al. (Bolan) 4,952,817 Aug. 28, 1990 Faucher et al. (Faucher) 5,404,543 Apr. 04, 1995 (filed May 29, 1992) Claims 7 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Takada in view of Bolan and Faucher, and further in view of Itano for claim 8 or Chase for claim 9. Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 17, mailed January 7, 1997) for the examiner's complete reasoning in 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007