Appeal No. 1997-2057 Application No. 08/287,670 system. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection of claim 7. As to claims 8 and 9, which depend from claim 7, neither Itano nor Chase cures the deficiencies of the Takada, Bolan, Faucher combination. Therefore, we must reverse the rejections of claim 8 and 9 as well. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 7 through 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ag/rk 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007