Appeal No. 1997-2057 Application No. 08/287,670 circuit is connected to a fully powered circuit, and that Faucher teaches power management by individually reducing voltage supplied to various circuits to reduce power consumption while preventing data loss. The examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to combine the teachings of Bolan and Faucher with the disclosure of Takada for the missing limitations to reject independent claim 7. Appellants set forth numerous arguments, only two of which we will discuss. In particular, appellants first contend (Brief, pages 13-18) that Takada fails to disclose the claimed variable power source means, since the output is always a single voltage rather than the claimed range of voltages. Appellants allege (Brief, page 13) that Takada's elements form a voltage regulator rather than a variable power source because of the single voltage output. Second, appellants argue (Brief, pages 23-24) that there is no suggestion in the references that any of the elements of Takada could or should be used for the purpose of power management. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007