Appeal No. 1997-3161
Application No. 08/450,553
and the Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and Answers 2
for the respective details thereof.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that Appellant’s specification in this application
provides an enabling disclosure in a manner which complies
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112. We are also of the
view that the appealed claims particularly point out the
invention in a manner which complies with 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph. Finally, it is our opinion that the
evidence relied upon and the level of skill in the particular
art would not have suggested to
one of ordinary skill in the art the obviousness of the
invention
2The Appeal Brief was filed September 13, 1996. In
response to the Examiner’s Answer dated April 7, 1997, a Reply
Brief was filed June 6, 1997 which was acknowledged and
entered by the Examiner without further comment on October 16,
1997.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007