Ex parte CHIU et al. - Page 9




               Appeal No. 1997-3303                                                                          Page 9                    
               Application No. 08/171,126                                                                                              


               region with a part of the perturbation portion.  Okai goes on to state (col. 2, lines 40-44) that the                   

               plurality of separate electrodes formed on the feedback region so as to correspond to different areas of                

               the perturbation portion, can be used as the above-mentioned structure.  This is best shown in figures                  

               7A and 7B.  Figure 7A shows (col. 6, lines 22-32) light distribution as hatched region (715) in                         

               response to a uniformly applied electric field.  Okai specifically states (col. 6, lines 32-40) that:                   

                       When the voltage is applied to one of the separate electrodes 707 or the current                                
                       supplied to the electrode is varied to change the refractive index of that part of                              
                       the optical guide layer 706 which corresponds to the above electrode, the light                                 
                       intensity distribution in the feedback region is varied as shown in FIG. 7B, and                                
                       thus the degree of coupling of light traveling in the feedback region with that                                 
                       part of that perturbation portion 711 which corresponds to the electrode, is varied.                            

               Appellants argue (rbrief, page 11) that at most, Okai can be viewed as disclosing the formation of a                    

               sectional grating which is a physical grating, and that appellants do not physically form a grating but                 

               instead disclose the formation of an electro-optic grating.  Appellants’ statement that they do not                     

               “physically form a grating” is inconsistent with the specification which discloses (page 7, lines 18-20)                

               that “a conductive material is deposited upon the cladding region 16 in the form of a grating 17 as                     

               shown in Fig. 8 by photolithographic techniques.”  We believe that appellants meant to state that the                   

               instant invention replaces the corregated gratings found in Sakata and Okai with an electro-optic grating               

               that eliminates the need for a corregated grating by applying a difference of potential across the cladding             

               or waveguide that results in the preparation of a grating of controlled refractive index, with the control              

               being obtained by regulation of the voltage bias (specification, page 9).  However, in view of Okai’s                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007