Appeal No. 1997-3314 Application 08/266,783 irradiation can occur at room temperature or at elevated substrate temperatures (col. 5, lines 18-19) and, therefore, indicates that the simultaneous irradiation and metal deposition can take place at a temperature as low as room temperature. In view of the above-discussed prior art, we conclude that the invention recited in appellants’ claim 1 would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellants’ invention. Appellants argue that Sallo’s substrate naturally heats up during the sputtering of the chromium onto the substrate because sputtering is a high energy process (brief, page 4). This argument is not persuasive in view of the indication by Clabes, as discussed above, that the sputtering can take place at room temperature. The evidence of record does not indicate that the high energy of the chromium particles bombarding the substrate would cause the substrate temperature to increase from room temperature to more than appellants’ upper temperature limit of about 60EC. Appellants have provided mere attorney argument to that effect, and such argument 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007