Appeal No. 1997-3441
Application No. 08/614,920
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Kurtz et al. (Kurtz) 5,165,283 Nov. 24,
1992
Takasu 5,326,991 Jul. 05,
1994
(Filed Dec. 10, 1991)
Fang et al. (Fang) 1 2,756,915 Jul.
08, 1978
(German Patent Publication)
Ito (Japanese Kokai) 1 2-7474 Jan. 11,
1990
Adel S. Sedra et al. (Sedra), “Appendix A” in Microelectronic
Circuits, 796 (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982).
Claims 1-15 and 31 stand finally rejected as being based on
an inadequate disclosure under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C.
§ 112. Claims 1-15, 29, and 31 stand finally rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Ito, Fang, Sedra, Takasu, and
Kurtz, all considered together.
1Copies of the translations of the Fang and Ito
references provided by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office,
December 1999, are included and relied upon for this decision.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007