Appeal No. 1997-3441
Application No. 08/614,920
well, none of the references have any suggestion of implementing
a MOSFET in a same conductivity type well. The Examiner has
provided no indication as to how and where the skilled artisan
might have found it obvious to modify the teachings of the
applied prior art to arrive at the claimed invention.
Accordingly, since the Examiner has failed to establish a prima
facie case of obviousness, we do not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of independent claims 1, 10, and 29, nor of claims 2-
9, 11-15, and 31 dependent thereon.
14
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007