Ex parte SHIROTA et al. - Page 1




                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                         

                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was                                           
                       not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding                                          
                       precedent of the Board.                                                                                      
                                                                                                   Paper No. 24                     
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                         ____________                                                               
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         ____________                                                               
                               Ex parte RIICHIRO SHIROTA and MASAKI MOMODOMI                                                        
                                                         ____________                                                               
                                                   Appeal No. 1997-3442                                                             
                                              Application No. 08/210,2881                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                               
                                                HEARD: January 13, 2000                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                               
               Before KRASS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  




                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                     
               claims 1 through 9.  Claims 14 through 16 have been allowed and                                                      
               claims 10 through 13 have been indicated by the examiner as                                                          
               being directed to allowable subject matter.                                                                          

                       1Application for patent filed March 18, 1994.                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007