Ex parte YASAR et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 33              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte TUGRUL YASAR,                                 
                                 RODNEY L. ROBINSON,                                  
                                    DANIEL DEYO                                       
                                 and MARIAN ZIELINSKI                                 
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-3515                                 
                             Application No. 08/390,226                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                 HEARD: MAY 17, 2000                                  
                                   _______________                                    

          Before ABRAMS, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                    
          finally rejecting claims 1-23, which constitute all of the                  
          claims of record in the application.                                        



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007