Ex parte YASAR et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1997-3515                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/390,226                                                                                                             



                          The appellants’ invention is directed to a transport                                                                          
                 system for wafer processing.  The claims before us on appeal                                                                           
                 have been reproduced in an appendix to the Brief.                                                                                      
                                                               THE REFERENCES                                                                           
                          The references relied upon by the examiner to support the                                                                     
                 final rejection are:                                                                                                                   
                 Okano et al. (Okano)                                  4,526,643                           Jul.  2,                                     
                 1985                                                                                                                                   
                 Belna                                                 4,624,617                           Nov. 25,                                     
                 1986                                                                                                                                   
                 Kita et al. (Kita)                                    4,766,993                           Aug. 30,                                     
                 1988                                                                                                                                   
                 Kemmerer et al. (Kemmerer)                            4,793,911                           Dec. 27,                                     
                 1988                                                                                                                                   
                 Kawaguchi et al. (Kawaguchi)                                   4,800,818                           Jan.                                
                 31, 1989                                                                                                                               
                 Bloomquist et al. (Bloomquist)  4,834,855                                        May  30,                                              
                 1989                                                                                                                                   
                 Norman                                                5,110,249                           May   5,                                     
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                                           
                          The following rejections stand under 35 U.S.C. § 103:1                                                                        
                          (1) Claims 1-4, 6-13 and 15-19 on the basis of either                                                                         
                 Norman            or Bloomquist in view of Belna, Kita and Kawaguchi.                                                                  
                          (2) Claims 5, 14 and 20-23 on the basis of either Norman                                                                      

                          1A rejection of the claims as being unpatentable over                                                                         
                 Flint in view of Belna, Kita and Kawaguchi was withdrawn in                                                                            
                 the Examiner’s Answer.                                                                                                                 
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007