Ex parte SEABAUGH et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                            Paper No. 13              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                     Ex parte ALAN C. SEABAUGH, YUNG CHUNG KAO,                       
                        ANDREW J. PURDES, and JOHN N. RANDALL                         
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No.1997-3695                                  
                             Application No. 08/097,526                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative                   
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the rejection of claims              
          1 through 3.  Claims 4 and 5 have been allowed.                             
               Appellants’ invention is generally directed to a method                
          of forming quantum devices and in particular, to selective                  
          epitaxial deposition using an epitaxy mask formed by sidewall               

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007