Ex parte SEABAUGH et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3695                                                        
          Application No. 08/097,526                                                  

               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Nishida et al. (Nishida)           05-144732                                
          Jun. 11, 1993                                                               
          (Japanese)                                                                  
          Johnson,  Jr., C.,  et  al., “Method  for  Making  Submicron                
          Dimensions  in  Structures  Using  Sidewall  Image  Transfer                
          Techniques.” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 9,             
          pp. 4587-89                                                                 
          (Feb. 1984).                                                                
          Galeuchet, Y.D., et al., "In situ GalnAs/Inp quantum dot arrays             
          by selective area metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy."  Applied               
          Physics Letters 58(21), pp. 2423-25 (May 27, 1991).                         
          Randall, J.N., et al., "Electric field coupling to quantum dot              
          diodes."  Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, B9(6)                   
          pp. 2893-97 (Nov./Dec. 1991).                                               
               Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being obvious over Nishida, Galeuchet, Johnson, and                      
          Randall.                                                                    
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants and the                 
          Examiner, reference is made to the brief and the answer for                 
          the details thereof.                                                        
                                      OPINION                                         
               After careful review of the evidence before us, we do not              
          agree with the Examiner that claims 1 through 3 are properly                
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  Accordingly, we reverse.                   


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007