Ex parte PHAN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3730                                                        
          Application No. 08/095,147                                                  


               an anode spaced from a retainer of a sputter etch                      
          chamber;                                                                    
               said retainer retaining a semiconductor wafer having an                
                    inactive region and an active region;                             
               at least one diode formed within said inactive region of               
                    said wafer near the outer periphery of said wafer;                
          and                                                                         
               said diode is capable of electrical connection to said                 
                    retainer.                                                         
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Dean et al. (Dean)            4,473,455                Sep. 25,             
          1984                                                                        
          Tai et al. (Tai)              4,496,448                Jan. 29,             
          1985                                                                        
          Harrington, III (Harrington)       4,943,537                Jul.            
          24, 1990                                                                    
          Lee et al. (Lee)              5,292,399                Mar. 08,             
          1994                                                                        
                                                  (Filed Jan. 08, 1992)               
          Singer, Peter H., “Evaluating Plasma Etch Damage,”                          
          Semiconductor International, pp. 78-81 (May 1992).                          
               Claims 1 to 14 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
          103.  As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner offers Singer                
          in view of Harrington and Lee with respect to claims 1 to 5,                
          adding Dean to the basic combination with respect to claim 6,               
          and adding Tai to the basic combination with respect to claims              
          7 to 14.                                                                    


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007