Ex parte HELMICK - Page 24




          Appeal No. 1997-4444                                                        
          Application 08/427,884                                                      

               The patents to Uchiumi, Tomita, and Elliott do not                     
          overcome the deficiencies of Yamakawa with respect to the                   
          rejection of claim 25.  Accordingly, the rejection of claim 28              
          is reversed.                                                                


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               The rejection of claims 1, 13-18, and 28 under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 112, second paragraph, is reversed.                                       
               The rejection of claims 4-8, 12, 13, 21-24 under                       
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) over Yamakawa is sustained and the                       
          rejection of claims 1, 25, 26  under § 102(e) over Yamakawa is              
          reversed.                                                                   
               The rejection of claims 21, 22, and 24 under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(b) over Satoh is sustained.                                           
               The rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is                     
          sustained and the rejections of claims 9, 10, 14-20, 23, 27,                
          and 28 under § 103 are reversed.                                            








                                       - 24 -                                         





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007