THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YOSHIYUKI YOKOMACHI and KAZUKI MURATA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-4446
Application No. 08/278,151
____________
HEARD: March 7, 2000
____________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 10, 19 through 40, and 47.
Claims 11 through 18 and 41 through 46 have been withdrawn
from consideration as directed to a non-elected species.
Appellants' invention relates to a rotary head type
magnetic recording/reproducing apparatus with a dynamic
tracking system. In particular, the tracking system detects a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007