Ex parte DUNCAN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-0212                                       Page 3           
          Reissue Application No. 07/837,588                                          


          withdrew the nonelected claims, viz., claims 35-39, from                    
          consideration.  (‘176 Application, Paper No. 12 at 1-2.)                    


               During an interview on March 9, 1989, the appellant                    
          authorized the examiner to cancel the nonelected claims by an               
          “Examiner’s Amendment.”  (‘176 Application, Paper No. 19.)  On              
          March 13, 1989, the examiner mailed a “Notice of                            
          Allowability,” which included the Examiner’s Amendment                      
          canceling the nonelected claims, (‘176 Application, Paper No.               
          20 at 2), and a “Notice of Allowance and Issue Fee Due.”  On                
          March 31, 1989, the appellant filed an “Amendment under Rule                
          312.”  (‘176 Application, Paper No. 22)  The amendment                      
          referenced the Examiner’s Amendment and acknowledged the                    
          interview.  (Id. at 1-2.)  The amendment was entered.  (‘176                
          Application, Paper No. 23.)  On June 13, 1989, the appellant                
          filed an “Issue Fee Transmittal.”                                           
          On August 15, 1989, the application was issued as U.S. Patent               
          No. 4,857,814 ('814 Patent).  The ‘814 Patent included claims               
          1-34.                                                                       










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007