Appeal No. 1998-0212 Page 4 Reissue Application No. 07/837,588 On June 19, 1989, the appellant filed a “Supplemental Amendment under Rule 1.312.” (‘176 Application, Paper No. 24.) The supplemental amendment attempted to cancel the nonelected claims, which had already been canceled by the Examiner’s Amendment, “for incorporation in a divisional application.” (Id. at 1-2.) It also attempted to cancel allowed claims 13, 27-31, and 55 for incorporation “into a continuation application.” (Id. at 2.) Because the supplemental amendment “reached the appropriate official for action after the patent issued,” (‘176 Application, Paper No. 25), the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied its entry. On September 25, 1989, the PTO informed the appellant of the denial. (Id.) On May 17, 1990, the appellant filed U.S. Patent Application No. 07/526,711 (‘711 Reissue Application), which was for reissue of the ‘814 Patent. On February 18, 1992, he filed U.S. Patent Application No. 07/837,588, which was a continuation of the ‘711 Reissue Application and abandoned the latter. (Paper No. 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007