Appeal No. 1998-0212 Page 6
Reissue Application No. 07/837,588
(d) sensing load on said rotor by
measuring the time the rotor takes to run down in
speed from a motor power off condition to a speed
condition in which application of power to the motor
will cause reversal of rotation of the rotor
constituting a condition for reversal.
Claims 35-74, 76-85, 87, 88, 90-107, 109, 110, and 112-
144 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 251 as not being based on
an error correctable by reissue of the original patent.
Rather than repeat the arguments of the appellant or examiner
in toto, we refer the reader to the briefs and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejections advanced by
the examiner. Furthermore, we duly considered the arguments
and evidence of the appellant and examiner. After considering
the totality of the record, we are persuaded that the examiner
erred in rejecting claims 35-74 and 76 and 121-144. We are
not persuaded, however, that he erred in rejecting claims 77-
85,
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007