Appeal No. 1998-0632
Application 08/301,812
appellants assert at least at page 3 of the principal brief on
appeal. The nature of the entire specification and drawings
as filed is to teach reasonably so, in our view, to the
artisan the ability of the image processor station 30 to
ascertain various dynamic states associated with each of these
type of parameters which are well known anyway to determine an
end result of a liquid level or a bubble level as set forth in
various claims on appeal. The action station of the claims is
also characterized as a force creating station for producing a
fluid in a dynamic state in accordance with a brief
description of Figure 2 at page 5 of the specification as
filed.
11
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007