THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALEX K. RAITH
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0666
Application 08/467,876
___________
ON BRIEF
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 13-15, 47, 48 and 54-
62, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application. The disclosed invention pertains to
the field of conserving battery power in mobile units of a
radiocommunication system. More particularly, the invention
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007