Appeal No. 1998-0666
Application 08/467,876
to the examiner’s reading. Therefore, we sustain the
rejection of claims 47 and 57.
With respect to claims 48, 58 and 62, appellant argues
that the feature of the unaddressed information element is not
found or alleged to be found in Tayloe [brief, page 6]. The
examiner responds that the DRX factor in Tayloe is sent as
time division multiplexed information which relies on timing
rather than addresses to reach the mobile unit, and therefore,
meets the language of these claims [answer, page 7]. We agree
with the examiner and note that appellant has offered no
rebuttal to this position of the examiner. Therefore, we also
sustain the rejection of these claims.
In conclusion, we have sustained the examiner’s
rejection of all pending claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 13-
15, 47, 48 and 54-62 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007