Appeal No. 1998-0666
Application 08/467,876
a new paging area 100. That is, the radiocommunication system
in Tayloe, including all the paging areas 100 [Figure 1],
transmits wake-up information to a mobile unit at this time
which either maintains the previously assigned page class or
commands the mobile unit to use a new page class. The claims
do not preclude the transmitting step, the transmitter or the
processing unit from making the adjustment as paging areas are
entered. Tayloe would clearly meet this broad statement of
the invention.
Therefore, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of
claims 13, 54 and 59 as anticipated by the disclosure of
Tayloe. Since dependent claims 14, 15, 55, 56, 60 and 61 are
grouped with one of these independent claims [brief, page 4],
we also sustain the rejection of these claims.
With respect to claims 47 and 57, appellant argues
that these claims are not met by Tayloe because Tayloe fails
to teach or suggest the transmission of any page frame
modifier [brief, page 6]. This argument has already been
decided adversely to appellant. Additionally, the examiner
has explained how he reads these claims on Tayloe [answer,
page 7], and appellant has not provided any rebuttal arguments
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007