Appeal No. 1998-0666
Application 08/467,876
process [column 3, lines 8-12], we agree with the examiner
that the disclosure as a whole suggests that this wake-up
information is continually adjusted and transmitted to each
mobile unit as conditions warrant. In other words, the
artisan would have understood from the Tayloe disclosure that
DRX information is also transmitted to mobile units after
registration has occurred. Otherwise, a substantial number of
mobile units would be unaffected by the traffic considerations
which are so important in Tayloe. Such a reading of Tayloe
seems inappropriate to this panel. Thus, we find that the
disclosure of Tayloe, as understood by the artisan, meets the
claim recitations of transmitting page frame modifiers from
the system to the mobile units to maintain a current assigned
page class or to establish a new assigned page class.
Even if appellant’s argument that Tayloe sets wake-up
information only at initial registration is correct, we are
still of the view that the invention of independent claims 13,
54 and 59 would be met by the operation of Tayloe’s system.
Specifically, we view these claims as broad enough to be met
by the page frame update in Tayloe which would occur every
time a given mobile unit leaves one paging area 100 and enters
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007