THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GERARDUS V.A. ABEN and
LEO H.M. KRINGS
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0870
Application No. 08/325,015
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 9, which
are all of the claims pending in this application.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
display device having a display screen provided with an
antistatic, light-absorbing coating and to a method of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007