Appeal No. 1998-0870 Application No. 08/325,015 most part consists of the specified homogeneous mixture. In other words, the final coating on the display screen can contain other unspecified ingredients as long as it mainly consists (i.e., greater than 50%) of the specified homogeneous mixture. We next look to the specification to determine whether appellants are using the phrase “predominately consists of” in a manner that is different from its ordinary meaning. However, we do not find any clear definition or explanation in the specification that would indicate that the phrase “predominately consists of” is being used more restrictively than in the ordinary sense. In the appellants’ specification at page 3, line 33 to page 4, line 5, appellants state that the “coating in accordance with the invention does not comprise a matrix of SiO . . . the coating consists of a 2 homogeneous mixture of both types of particles.” However, the language found in the specification (i.e., “coating . . . does not comprise SiO ” or “coating consists of”) is not recited in 2 claim 1 on appeal. Nor is the claimed phrase “predominately5 5It is well settled that limitations from the specification are not to be read into the claims. Comark Communication, Inc. v. Harris Corp., 156 F.3d 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007