Ex parte ABEN et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-0870                                                        
          Application No. 08/325,015                                                  


          most part consists of the specified homogeneous mixture.  In                
          other words, the final coating on the display screen can                    
          contain other unspecified ingredients as long as it mainly                  
          consists (i.e., greater than 50%) of the specified homogeneous              
          mixture.                                                                    
               We next look to the specification to determine whether                 
          appellants are using the phrase “predominately consists of” in              
          a manner that is different from its ordinary meaning.                       
          However, we do not find any clear definition or explanation in              
          the specification that would indicate that the phrase                       
          “predominately consists of” is being used more restrictively                
          than in the ordinary sense.  In the appellants’ specification               
          at page 3, line 33 to page 4, line 5, appellants state that                 
          the “coating in accordance with the invention does not                      
          comprise a matrix of SiO  . . . the coating consists of a                   
                                  2                                                   
          homogeneous mixture of both types of particles.”  However, the              
          language found in the specification (i.e., “coating . . . does              
          not comprise SiO ” or “coating consists of”) is not recited in              
                          2                                                           
          claim 1 on appeal.   Nor is the claimed phrase “predominately5                                                         


               5It is well settled that limitations from the specification are not to 
          be read into the claims.  Comark Communication, Inc. v. Harris Corp., 156 F.3d
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007