The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID C. REYNOLDS ____________ Appeal No. 1998-3024 Application No. 08/464,298 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, HECKER, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 8. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 8), claims 1 through 3, 5, 6 and 8 were canceled, and claims 4 and 7 were amended. Accordingly, claims 4 and 7 remain before us on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007