The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID C. REYNOLDS
____________
Appeal No. 1998-3024
Application No. 08/464,298
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, HECKER, and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 8. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 8),
claims 1 through 3, 5, 6 and 8 were canceled, and claims 4 and
7 were amended. Accordingly, claims 4 and 7 remain before us
on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007