Ex parte REYNOLDS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-3024                                                        
          Application No. 08/464,298                                                  



               second phase-shifting means coupled to said second clock               
          means to produce fourth clock pulses phase-shifted by at least              
          approximately 90°;                                                          
               means to couple said fourth clock pulses to said second                
          transmission gate to activate said second gate at the times of              
          occurrence of said fourth clock pulses;                                     
               and                                                                    
               means to couple together the outputs of said first and                 
          second transmission gates to form a multiplexer for merging                 
          the signals produced at the outputs of said first and second                
          transmission gates to develop a stream of signals                           
          corresponding to a composite of said synchronized output                    
          signals from said first and second clocked CMOS signal                      
          sources.                                                                    
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Archer et al. (Archer)        3,947,697                Mar. 30,             
          1976                                                                        
               Claims 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over the prior art Figure 1 of the instant               
          application in view of Archer.                                              
               Reference is made to the briefs and the answers for the                
          respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.                     
                                       OPINION                                        
               The obviousness rejection of claims 4 and 7 is reversed.               



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007