Ex parte ANDERSON et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written    
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                                   Paper No. 24            
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                       ____________                                        
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                              
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                       ____________                                        
                       Ex parte MICHAEL B. ANDERSON, KENNETH C.                            
                               SCHMITT AND DAVID M. WEBER                                  
                                       ____________                                        
                                  Appeal No. 1998-3035                                     
                               Application No. 08/580,036                                  
                                       ____________                                        
                                         ON BRIEF                                          
                                       ____________                                        
          Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative                        
          Patent Judges.                                                                   
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           





                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
                This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection                  
          of claims 1-26, all of the claims pending in the present                         
          application.  An amendment after final rejection filed August                    
          25, 1997 was approved for entry by the Examiner.                                 
                The claimed invention relates to a method and circuit for                  
          generating dual-phase clock signals from a single clock input.                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007