THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 37 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN W. KOSHAK ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0220 Application No. 08/540,323 ____________ HEARD: March 6, 2000 ____________ Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1 to 4, 6 to 12, 21 and 27 to 30, as amended subsequent to the final rejection. These claims constitute 1 all of the claims pending in this application. We AFFIRM. 1While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection (Paper No. 12, filed April 15, 1997), we note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007