Ex parte ITOH et al. - Page 22




          Appeal No. 1999-0404                                      Page 22           
          Application No. 08/580,256                                                  


               Claim 9 reads as follows:                                              
                    In a refrigerating apparatus comprising a                         
               refrigerating cycle using a refrigerant mixture flowing                
               through a condenser and an evaporator, the improvement                 
               comprising at least one of said condenser and evaporator               
               including a heat transfer pipe having an inner surface                 
               comprising main grooves and auxiliary grooves                          
               intersecting with said main grooves, wherein said main                 
               grooves are separated by ridges, and said ridges are                   
               divided into ribs by said auxiliary grooves, and wherein               
               a length of said  ribs formed along the direction of said              
               main grooves is made longer than a width of said ridges,               
               a width of said auxiliary grooves is made smaller than                 
               the length of said ribs and further said auxiliary                     
               grooves are formed in a direction where a pressure                     
               gradient in said heat transfer pipe is reduced.                        


               In addition to the teachings of Chiang set forth above                 
          with respect to claim 1, the examiner relies of the Jepson                  
          format of claim 9 as admitting that a refrigerating apparatus               
          comprising a refrigerating cycle using a refrigerant mixture                
          flowing through a condenser and an evaporator is known prior                
          art.                                                                        




              Based on our analysis and review of Chiang and claim 9,                
          it is our opinion that the only difference between Chiang and               
          claim 9 is the limitation that the heat transfer pipe is used               







Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007