The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KARIN S. BICKFORD, HERBERT K. STAFFIN and ROBERT N. ROAPER II ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0546 Application No. 08/724,542 ____________ HEARD: OCTOBER 12, 2000 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges. LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 17 and 25. Claims 18 through 24 and 26 through 28 were withdrawn from consideration as being for a non-elected invention (see Paper No. 4, mailed December 2, 1997, page 2). These are all of the claims in this application.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007