Ex parte BICKFORD et al. - Page 3




         Appeal No. 1999-0546                                                    
         Application No. 08/724,542                                              


                                   BACKGROUND                                    
              The appellants' invention relates to a process for                 
         removal of sand cores from cast parts (specification, p. 1).            
         A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix          
         to the appellants' brief.                                               
              The prior art references of record relied upon by the              
         examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                          
         Crafton et al. (Crafton)             5,294,094     Mar. 15,            
         1994                                                                    
         Bonnemasou et al.(Bonnemasou)         5,423,370     Jun. 13,            
         1995                                                                    


              Claims 1 through 17 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.          
         ' 103 as being unpatentable over Bonnemasou in view of                  
         Crafton.                                                                


              Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced          
         by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted            
         rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper           
         No. 9, mailed September 25, 1998) for the examiner's complete           
         reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the appellants'          

                                        3                                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007