Appeal No. 1999-0546 Application No. 08/724,542 BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to a process for removal of sand cores from cast parts (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Crafton et al. (Crafton) 5,294,094 Mar. 15, 1994 Bonnemasou et al.(Bonnemasou) 5,423,370 Jun. 13, 1995 Claims 1 through 17 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 as being unpatentable over Bonnemasou in view of Crafton. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 9, mailed September 25, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the appellants' 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007