Appeal No. 1999-1763
Application No. 08/834,931
limitation that, if considered alone, would have been viewed
as non-statutory subject matter.
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 8
under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Price is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being obvious over Price is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 101
as being drawn to non-statutory subject matter is reversed.
16
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007