THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID F. LAURASH and GEORGE T. TAYLOR
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2063
Application No. 08/744,432
____________
HEARD: February 22, 2000
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of newly presented claims 21-26 in this broadening
reissue application based on appellants’ U.S. Patent
5,413,383. Claims 1-20, which correspond to the claims of the
original patent, have been allowed. No other claims are
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007