Appeal No. 2000-0146 Page 4
Application No. 08/979,069
visible symbol is over the selected text at the
source location;
b) zooming from a first bounding rectangle for
the selected block of text at a source location to a
second bounding rectangle for the selected block of
text at the destination location such that the
movement of the first bounding rectangle to the size
and location of the second bounding rectangle at the
destination location is animated.
(Appeal Br., App. A.)
The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the
claims follows:
Peters et al. (“Peters”) 5,157,763 Oct.
20, 1992.
Claims 20 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as
anticipated by Peters.
OPINION
After considering the record, we are persuaded that the
examiner erred in rejecting claims 20 and 21. Accordingly,
we reverse.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007