Appeal No. 96-2323 Application 08/116,555 The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows: claims 1-3, 5, 7-15, 17 and 18 over Fan; claim 16 over Fan in view of 13 Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering; and claims 4 and 16 over Fan in view of Cadel. OPINION We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with appellants that the aforementioned rejections are not well founded. Accordingly, we reverse these rejections. We first address the rejection of appellants’ broadest process claim, which is claim 1, and then address the rejection of product-by-process claim 18. Rejection of claim 1 Fan discloses a process for making a water-in-oil emulsion of a water-soluble polymer by polymerizing at least one water-soluble vinyl monomer which is in a water-in-oil emulsion (col. 2, lines 3-20). Before the polymerization is initiated, the water-in-oil emulsion is deoxygenated by a method such as subjecting it to a vacuum of from about 50 to about 500 mm of mercury under an inert gas atmosphere at a 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007