Appeal No. 1997-3813 Application No. 08/371,205 failed to show any reasonable expectation, or some predictability, that Takata’s calcined and sintered materials would be effective as a packing for liquid chromatography when the sizes of the crystalline particles are optimized for use as a filling in a bone cavity or as a prosthetic member of bones. In re Shetty, 566 F.2d 81, 86, 191 USPQ 753, 756-57 (CCPA 1977). Nor has the examiner presented any evidence to establish that the optimized range of crystalline particle sizes for the purpose of Takata would at least generically encompass the appellants’ range of average crystalline particle sizes. Cf. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936 (Fed. Cir. 1990). For these reasons, we hold that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness against appealed claim 62 over Takata within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103. Lastly, we consider the examiner’s § 103 rejection of appealed claim 62 over Kawasaki in view of Kirkland. The examiner states that “[a]t best, the claim differs from Kawasaki (Eur. J. Biochem. 157, 291-295 (June 2, 1986)) in evidencing the pore size and the new limitation of a particle 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007