Ex parte KUSUNOKI et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1998-0088                                                        
          Application 08/622,327                                                      



          lie under Fujii's tunneling layer 14, as in necessary for Fujii to          
          inherently satisfy claim 15.8                                               
               For the foregoing reasons, we are reversing the § 102(b)               
          rejection of claims 15 and 16 for anticipation by Fujii.                    
               We are reversing the § 103 rejection of claims 15 and 16 based         
          on Fujii because the examiner has not explained how or why it would         
          have been obvious to modify Fujii's device in order to satisfy the          
          requirement that the nitrided oxide layer be at least at the drain          
          avalanche hot carrier injection region.                                     
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule            
          notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz.         
          Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR                   




               8  Min-Liang Chen et al., "Suppression of Hot-Carrier Effects in       
          Submicrometer CMOS Technology," 35 IEEE Transactions on Electron            
          Devices 2210-20 (December 1998), of which a copy was provided with          
          the Brief, shows (at 2211, Fig. 1) that the drain avalanche hot             
          carrier injection region is located within the channel region and           
          adjacent to the lightly doped (N-) drain region when the drain              
          includes a lightly doped (N-)region and a heavily doped (N+) region,        
          which is not the case in Fujii's device.  The positional relationship       
          shown in Chen et al. also appears in appellants' Figure 20 (Spec. at        
          29, l. 21 to p. 30, l. 3).                                                  
                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007