The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SCOTT SARNIKOWSKI, UNMESH AGARWALA,
STANLEY S. QUAN, CHARLES E. COMSTOCK, and FRANK G. MOORE
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-0706
Application 08/166,2791
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MARTIN, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's December 4, 1996, Office action finally rejecting
claims 8, 12, 16-21, and 26-41, all of the pending claims. In
the Answer, the examiner adhered to the rejections of only
1Application filed December 13, 1993, as a continuation
of Application 07/599,325, filed October 17, 1990 (abandoned).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007