Ex parte ISHIBASHI - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 21         


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte KEIZI ISHIBASHI                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1669                                 
                              Application No. 08/508,563                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: January 16, 2001                                
                                     ____________                                     


          Before JOHN D. SMITH, KRATZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                     
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 13,                 
          which are all of the claims pending in the subject                          
          application.                                                                
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal and is                 
          reproduced below:                                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007