Ex parte KIHARA et al. - Page 6




                Appeal No. 1998-2147                                                                                                       
                Application No. 08/247,356                                                                                                 


                 cleavable C-O-C bond.  (Column 5, line 50 to column 6, line 31).  Thus, the                                               

                 dissolution inhibitor contains at least one acid-cleavable ether bond which is                                            

                 decomposed by the acid liberated from the acid generating compound.                                                       

                          Uenishi ‘389 and ‘582 disclose positive type photosensitive compositions                                         

                 comprising a binder and a photosensitive dissolution inhibitor.  The dissolution                                          

                 inhibitor contains a multi-aromatic ring compound, which contains a cyclic ring                                           

                 system constituted of heteroatoms and quinone diazide radicals.  (‘389, column 2 line                                     

                 36 to column 8, line 24; ‘582 column 2, line 34 to column 3, line 68).  Uenishi                                           

                 discloses quinone diazide dissolution inhibitor compounds produce an alkali-soluble                                       

                 substance when irradiated with light to undergo decomposition.    (‘389, column 1                                         

                 lines 30-35; ‘582 column 1, lines 50-57).  Uenishi does not disclose the presence of a                                    

                 compound which forms an acid upon exposure to radiation or that the dissolution                                           

                 inhibitor contains groups which are cleaved by an acid.                                                                   

                                                              OPINION                                                                      

                          We have carefully reviewed the claims, specification and applied prior art,                                      

                 including all of the arguments advanced by both the Examiner and Appellants in support                                    

                 of their respective positions.  This review leads us to conclude that only the § 112,                                     

                 first paragraph, rejection is well founded.  Accordingly, we will sustain the § 112, first                                


                                                                   -6-                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007