Appeal No. 1998-2925 Application 08/532,861 implanting indium into the source and drain regions to a concentration peak density at a third depth relative to the upper surface of said substrate; and implanting p-type dopant into the conductive gate via the exposed surface to a concentration peak density at a second depth relative to the upper surface of said conductive gate wherein the second depth is shallower than said first depth. THE REFERENCES Mitsui et al. (Mitsui) 5,296,401 Mar. 22, 1994 Yoshizumi et al. (Yoshizumi) 5,328,864 Jul. 12, 1994 C-M. Lin et al. (Lin), “Sub-100-nm p -n shallow junctions+ fabricated by group III dual ion implantation and rapid thermal annealing”, 54 Appl. Phys. Lett. 1790-92 (1989). THE REJECTIONS Claims 1-7, 11 and 13-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Yoshizumi or Mitsui, in view of Lin. OPINION We reverse the rejections of claims 1-7 and affirm the rejections of claims 11 and 13-18. We denominate the affirmances as involving new grounds of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b). Appellants state that the claims stand or fall in two groups: 1) claims 1-7, and 2) claims 11 and 13-18 (brief, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007