Appeal No. 1998-2938 Application 08/510,752 Stark shifts for at least one polarity of applied electric field from 0 up to 100 kV/cm and zero field E1-LH1 and E1-HH1 transitions that are substantially degenerate," as recited in claim 1. In the Final Rejection the Examiner stated that what constitutes "substantially matching" is not defined and that there appears to be little or no variability in figure 3 (FR6-7). Appellants do not address the Examiner's arguments about "substantially" being a relative term. It appears that the term "substantially matching" may be defined in the specification because it is discussed (specification, p. 6, line 34 to p. 7, line 3): "The degree of residual mismatch between the two Stark shifts for positive fields [according to the invention] is computed as less than 1meV over the range from 0 to 100kV/cm. This compares with a separation of 6meV at a field of 100 kV/cm in respect of the Stark effect fields of Figure 3 in respect of quantum well possessing no substructure but strained to provide degeneracy at zero field strength." This has not been argued. Nevertheless, figure 3 of Ishikawa is of no help in establishing the obviousness of the property of substantially - 11 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007