Ex parte TROFAST et al. - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being                                                                         
                                   entered today was not written for publication                                                                        
                                  and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                           

                                                                                                              Paper No. 23                              
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                            Ex parte EVA ANN-CHRISTIN TROFAST,                                                                          
                                                MAGNUS OLSSON and CLAES AHLNECK                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                          Appeal No. 1999-0400                                                                          
                                                    Application No. 08/316,938                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                       HEARD: OCTOBER 25, 2000                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           

                 Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent                                                                               
                 Judges.1                                                                                                                               
                 McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                  

                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                         Eva Ann-Christin Trofast et al. appeal from the final                                                                          
                rejection of claims 1 through 8, 12 through 15, 24 through 29                                                                           
                and 31.  Claim 30 stands allowed.  Claims 18 through 23, the                                                                            



                          1Administrative Patent Judge Lazarus, who sat on the                                                                          
                 panel at the oral hearing, has retired.  His place has been                                                                            
                 taken by Administrative Patent Judge Abrams.  See In re Bose                                                                           
                 Corp., 772 F.2d 866, 227 USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                                                                                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007