The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte EVA ANN-CHRISTIN TROFAST, MAGNUS OLSSON and CLAES AHLNECK ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0400 Application No. 08/316,938 ____________ HEARD: OCTOBER 25, 2000 ____________ Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.1 McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Eva Ann-Christin Trofast et al. appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 8, 12 through 15, 24 through 29 and 31. Claim 30 stands allowed. Claims 18 through 23, the 1Administrative Patent Judge Lazarus, who sat on the panel at the oral hearing, has retired. His place has been taken by Administrative Patent Judge Abrams. See In re Bose Corp., 772 F.2d 866, 227 USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir. 1985).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007