Appeal No. 1999-0400
Application No. 08/316,938
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Sipos in view of Szczesny, Edmonds, Bremer,
Gibson, Moriya and Watson.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Sipos in view of Szczesny, Edmonds, Bremer
and Good.
Claims 1, 8 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Ibsen in view of Szczesny, Edmonds,
Bremer and Baichwal.
Claims 25 through 27 and 31/27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Edwards in view of
Madsen.
Claims 25 through 28 and 31/27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Edwards in view of
Edmonds.
Clams 25 through 27 and 31/27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sipos in view of
Madsen.
Claims 25 through 28 and 31/27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sipos in view of
Edmonds.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007