Appeal No. 1999-1131
Application No. 08/754,758
and the first and second sides are substantially perpendicular
to each other.
We have already established that neither Michael, Takeda,
Murai nor Werther teaches or suggests, either individually or
in combination, first and second pins arranged on
perpendicular sides. Therefore, based on this prior
reasoning, we reverse the Examiner's rejection of claims 14-17
as obvious over the combination of Michael, and Takeda.
Considering independent claim 18, it likewise includes
the claim limitation common to independent claims 1, 10, and
14. Specifically, claim 18 recites first pins and second
pins, wherein first pins are provided on a first side of a
semiconductor and second pins are provided on a second side
and the first and second sides are substantially perpendicular
to each other.
Having already established that neither Michael nor
Werther teaches or suggests, either individually or in
combination, first and second pins arranged on perpendicular
sides, we reverse the Examiner's rejection of claim 18 as
obvious over the combination of Michael and Werther.
15
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007