Ex Parte LIGLER et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No.  1999-1384                                                                                 
                 Application No.  08/583,912                                                                           
                        25. The device of claim 9, wherein, after said device has been used to                         
                             assay a first aqueous sample suspected of containing said liquid                          
                             analyte by:                                                                               
                                 flowing said first aqueous liquid sample, suspected of containing                     
                               the target analyte, normal to and through said membrane having                          
                               said complexes thereon, at a flow rate allowing the target analyte to                   
                               displace the labelled analog from the complexes under non-                              
                               equilibrium conditions to form downstream of said membrane a                            
                               liquid effluent including said displaced labelled analog, said flow                     
                               rate also providing an interaction time between said analyte and                        
                               said membrane of about 0.1 sec through about 30 sec; and                                
                                 interrogating said liquid effluent for the presence of said labelled                  
                               analog therein,                                                                         
                             said membrane may be rinsed and said device may be reused for the                         
                             steps of:                                                                                 
                                 flowing a second aqueous liquid sample, suspected of containing                       
                               target analyte, normal to and through said membrane having said                         
                               complexes thereon, at a flow rate allowing the target analyte in said                   
                               second sample to displace the labelled analog from the complexes                        
                               under non-equilibrium conditions to form downstream of said                             
                               membrane a liquid effluent including said labelled analog displaced                     
                               by said target analyte in said second sample, said flow rate also                       
                               providing an interaction time between said analyte in said second                       
                               sample and said membrane of about 0.1 sec through about 30 sec;                         
                               and                                                                                     
                                 interrogating said liquid effluent from said second sample for the                    
                               presence of said labelled analog displaced by said target analyte in                    
                               said second sample.                                                                     
                        The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                
                 Ligler et al. (Ligler)             5,183,740                  Feb.   2, 1993                         
                 Kidwell                           5,369,007                   Nov. 29, 1994                          
                                            GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                       
                        Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                           
                 indefinite because it is not clear what component of the device is further limited.                   
                        Claims 1-4, 7-14, 19-20 and 24-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                         
                 as being unpatentable over Ligler in view of Kidwell.                                                 
                        We reverse.                                                                                    


                                                          3                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007