Appeal No. 1999-1942
Application 08/770,037
oxide particles dispersed in the woven fabric;
wherein the second insulating layer is free of oxide
particles.
The Examiner relies on Appellants' admitted prior art
(APA) in figures 1-3 and the following references:
Foster 4,013,987 March 22, 1977
Mitsui et al. (Mitsui) 4,335,367 June 15, 1982
Penneck 4,521,549 June 4, 1985
The content of the prior art is fairly described by
Appellants (Brief, pp. 9-11).
Claims 1-16 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Foster, Penneck, and the
APA.
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Foster, Penneck, and the APA, as
applied to claim 10, further in view of Mitsui.
We refer to the final rejection (Paper No. 9) (pages
referred to as "FR__") and the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 15) (pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the2
Examiner's position, and to the brief (Paper No. 14) (pages
The pages of the examiner's answer are not numbered2
and have been numbered beginning with the cover sheet as
page 1.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007